The Algae Island in Life of Pi. OK. The algae island might be the second weirdest part of the book. It gets even stranger: dead fish rise to the surface of the ponds at night and disappear by morning. Initially Pi thinks the island is a delusion: I was getting used to my delusion. To make it last I refrained from putting a strain on it; when the lifeboat nudged the island, I did not move, only continued to dream. ![]() Pi describes the island very precisely. It just doesn't have the hazy feel of delusion: those gaps and blurred edges. One possibility is that the island represents some type of comfortable faith. When Pi first steps onto it he says as much: My foot sank into the clear water and met the rubbery resistance of something flexible but solid. I put more weight down. Shmoop guide to Animals = Humans in Life of Pi. Animals = Humans analysis by Ph.D. City Life vs Country Life Essay.Fatemah Professor English 101 11 November 2012 The City Life Vs. Life of Pi opens with a fictional author’s note, explaining the origins of the book. The author explains that while in India and floundering on the book he. Evolutionary biologists have never known what to make of viruses, arguing over their origins for decades. But a newly discovered group of giant viruses, called. Life of Pi is set against the tumultuous period of Indian history known as the Emergency. In 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was found guilty of charges related to. A boy, a tiger and a boat. These are the main elements of "Life of Pi," the 127-minute Ang Lee film, released this week, that many are hailing as a masterpiece and a. Nick Luciano got his dad to reenact a bunch of emotes from Overwatch. His dedication to accuracy is surpassed only by the sheer will he’s forced to conjure to. For a book that’s over 600 pages, The Host has very little action or plot development. Most of it is spent listening to Wanda and Melanie internally bicker over. ![]() ![]() The illusion would not give. I put the full weight of my foot. Still I did not believe. Or Saint Peter trying to walk on water after he sees Jesus do it? But maybe the island doesn't represent the type of faith Martel thinks we should have. Because, of course, the algae turns out to be man- eating algae. ![]() It's an island that can consume you if you're not careful. Meaning, if you appease yourself with physical comfort – all the food and drink you want – it turns into a type of spiritual death. If your faith is too easy and you no longer brave the stormy seas, then you're no longer experiencing real faith. Notice too that Pi really tames Richard Parker on the island. He has him jumping through hoops. Richard Parker, like the ocean, is part of Pi's spiritual trial. What do you do when your spiritual test (a. Richard Parker) follows your every command? You leave: By the time morning came, my grim decision was taken. I preferred to set off and perish in search of my own kind than to live a lonely half- life of physical comfort and spiritual death on this murderous island. What about the South African meerkats? Didn't Mohandas Gandhi (not the prime minister) pioneer civil disobedience in South Africa as an expatriate lawyer? He quotes him a couple times and even calls him . While Martel basically says no, he admits. How to Be a Whistleblower. Whistleblowing is in the news this week: Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is preparing to testify in front of a Senate panel on May 8th, and CNN reports that she will say she warned the White House about Michael Flynn’s connections with Russia almost three weeks before Flynn was fired. Now the Trump administration/Russia connection is some intrigue worthy of a John Le Carr? If a worker sees some dirty deeds and want to call attention to them, how can they protect themselves legally? One thing becomes apparent after the honeymoon of a newly- launched career is over: Your. But the protection laws do have a few things in common, and potential whistleblowers would be wise to follow a few general guidelines. Try to resolve the problem using internal channels first. Jon Tycko, of the Washington firm Tycko and Zavareei, says, “Ask yourself: Is there some avenue within the company or the agency for me to bring this wrongdoing to the attention of higher- ups? That is almost always going to be the first thing that a whistleblower does—to try to fix this problem internally.” Most government agencies or legitimate companies (i. After all, most companies want to know if someone working for them is breaking the law. Document your concerns in writing. And.. Be specific, and stay off Facebook.“In order to be protected, the employee has to engage in . That means not just generally complaining to anyone who will listen, or disagreeing with your bosses about corporate strategy or direction, “but complaining somewhat specifically about unsafe or illegal practices. And they have to report those issues either to supervisors within their company or to various regulators.”If you’ve been watching the Michael Flynn saga unfold, in which Flynn has offered to testify about. The speaking out has to be directed to those in positions in responsibility, whether within the company or at government agencies,” says Marshall. But let’s assume that doesn’t work. And then the question that I will always ask is ? Some documents that show that what you say is true? Or some other witnesses that were also in the meeting that will tell me that what you’re telling me is true?’ Information is knowledge, and knowledge is power. If you want someone to rally to your cause. They sound like a Grisham novel! Separating out the delusional conspiracy theories from the people who are really in the midst of a conspiracy is really the key.. But—Don’t gather too much evidence. Leave the flashlight and the Hefty bags at home. Marshall says, “An employee has to act reasonably. They cannot just go rifle through the file cabinets at night and collect troves of documents, grabbing up whatever they think might possibly bear on the issue.” Downloading vast amounts of data to a thumb drive means that would- be whistleblowers are taking documents that have nothing to do with their case and that they have no right to: client lists, proprietary information, salary info, trade secrets, etc. That makes the whistleblower vulnerable to lawsuits by the company, and weakens their case. Sometimes you have a really bad idea, but you need friends to help you pull it off. If a government investigator or the lawyer or FBI agent or whoever you’re going to show this to, if what you’ve taken taken demonstrates illegal conduct, they will not worry about how you got it. If that moment has come and gone, then Tycko says, “If you’re at the point where you haven’t been able to fix the problem internally, and you’re being targeted . Tycko notes that whistleblower law is very niche—he estimates maybe 5. U. S.—so potential whistleblowers need to look nationally and concentrate their search in big cities. Tycko wrote a brief guide to “qui tam” whistleblower cases—cases in which a worker discloses an employer’s unlawful conduct to the government and so becomes eligible to receive a reward that’s some fraction of the government’s recovery (think health care fraud)—so if that’s your situation, it’s worth a read. For everyone else, remember: Complain specifically, gather (not too much) evidence, stay off Facebook, and get a lawyer. It’s the final stretch: You’ve quit your job, and now all that stands between you and a different. Giant virus discovery sparks debate over tree of life : Nature News & Comment. Ella Maru Studio. An illustration of what a Klosneuvirus might look like. Evolutionary biologists have never known what to make of viruses, arguing over their origins for decades. But a newly discovered group of giant viruses, called Klosneuviruses, could be a 'missing link' that helps to settle the debate — or provoke even more discord. In 2. 00. 3, researchers reported that they had found giant viruses, which they named Mimiviruses, with genes that suggested their ancestors could live outside of a host cell. The discovery split researchers into two camps. One group thinks viruses started out as self- sufficient organisms that became trapped inside other cells, eventually becoming parasitic and jettisoning genes they no longer needed. Another group views viruses as particles that snatched genetic material from host organisms over hundreds of millions of years. A study. 2 published on 6 April in Science provides evidence for the latter idea, that viruses are made up of a patchwork of stolen parts. But it has already sparked controversy and is unlikely to settle the raucous debate. After the Mimivirus discovery, some researchers developed a theory that put viruses near the root of the evolutionary tree. They proposed that viruses comprised a . Normal viruses make their host cells produce proteins for them. The team that discovered Mimiviruses thought the virus' ability to make their own proteins suggested that these viral giants descended from ancient free- living cell type that may no longer exist. Mimiviruses contain too few eukaryotic- like genes to perform a statistical analysis that could determine their evolutionary relationships. The difficulty is compounded by the fact that viral genomes mutate very quickly. Klosneuviruses may fill this gap. Their genomes contain code for dozens of enzymes and other molecular machinery used in making proteins. Some of these parts have never been seen before in any virus, including Mimiviruses. They sequenced the genomes in their samples to identify the organisms present, and found four genomes similar to those of Mimiviruses. Using sophisticated software to trace the evolutionary history of their mystery genomes, the researchers found that the translation genes seemed to have been picked up one by one over hundreds of millions of years. This evidence supports the idea that viruses stole parts of their genomes, they say. It's possible, however, that Mimiviruses and Klosneuviruses originated in different ways, making both ideas on viral origins possible, says Frederik Schulz, a bioinformatician at the Joint Genome Institute and a co- author on the new study. Debating domains. It’s unclear which eukaryotic organisms donated their genes to the Klosneuvirus group. And because they haven't identified the host, the researchers can't grow the virus yet. The viruses do not seem to infect the same type of amoeba as Mimivirus and other known giant viruses. Claverie points out that the majority of the Klosneuviruses’ translation machinery does not match that of any other known organism. And he worries that the computational model used to infer the viruses’ ancestry could pick up leftover pieces of DNA in the sample, potentially contaminating the data. He says that plenty of evolutionary work can be done on a genome alone, and he is glad to see more papers coming to the conclusion that viruses are not a fourth domain of life. Mimivirus co- discover Didier Raoult, a microbiologist at Aix- Marseille University, says this latest discovery won’t settle the debate, but it’s a nice find nevertheless.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |